Why is Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle Ad Campaign Being Ripped as Nazi Propaganda?

Why Is Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle Ad Campaign Being Ripped as “Nazi Propaganda”?

What began as a seemingly harmless all-American denim ad starring actress Sydney Sweeney has quickly spiraled into one of the most controversial campaigns of the year — with critics accusing it of echoing fascist-era aesthetics and even resembling Nazi propaganda.

The ad, part of American Eagle’s summer 2025 campaign titled “Real. Raw. Free.”, features Sweeney in a series of sun-drenched images wearing classic denim, surrounded by wheat fields, horses, and vintage Americana symbols. It was meant to celebrate “rugged beauty and natural freedom.” But instead, it’s been called “eerily authoritarian,” “ethno-aesthetic,” and “ideologically loaded.”

Let’s break down why this campaign is under such intense fire.

📸 The Imagery That Sparked the Backlash

The controversy centers not just on Sweeney herself — a lightning rod for political discourse in recent years — but the visual choices made by American Eagle’s creative team.

In one now-viral photo, Sweeney is seen standing in a perfectly symmetrical wheat field at sunrise, her posture strong, chin raised, flanked by two blond boys on horseback, with an American flag in the distance. The scene immediately drew comparisons to Leni Riefenstahl’s fascist-era film visuals, particularly the kind used in Nazi propaganda that glorified “purity, nature, and national pride.”

“The Aryan aesthetic is undeniable,” wrote one critic.

“Who greenlit a shoot that looks like it was styled by the Third Reich’s PR department?” asked another.

😳 From Americana to Accusations

The outrage didn’t stop at aesthetic critique. Some cultural analysts claimed the ad deliberately plays into a coded form of white nationalist nostalgia, repackaging it as “wholesome heritage.”

“This isn’t just about wheat and jeans,” wrote one viral thread.
“This is about carefully constructed visual language that has roots in fascist idealism — clean lines, strong bodies, untouched nature, obedience through beauty.”

The fact that the campaign features almost exclusively white models in rural settings — without a trace of multicultural representation — only fanned the flames.

👩 Sydney Sweeney at the Center — Again

Sweeney, who’s been previously criticized for attending a MAGA-themed family party and following several right-leaning accounts online, has become a political lightning rod in recent years — despite not being outspoken herself.

This campaign has revived old debates about her public neutrality, with critics claiming she benefits from conservative-leaning iconography while staying silent on what it represents.

Her fans argue she’s just modeling jeans, not pushing ideology.

“She didn’t write the campaign brief,” one supporter posted.
“Let the girl act and wear denim in peace.”

But the internet is rarely that forgiving.

🧵 American Eagle Responds (Kind Of)

Amid the growing backlash, American Eagle issued a short, carefully worded statement:

“Our summer campaign aims to celebrate timeless American style and the beauty of nature. Any comparison beyond that is unintended and inaccurate.”

But that did little to quell the anger. Critics argue that the imagery could not have been accidental, especially in an era when brands are hyper-aware of symbolism and optics.

🔥 Cultural Whiplash: From Woke to… This?

Some believe this is part of a larger industry trend — a deliberate pull away from “woke” advertising and back toward “heritage” branding, which can carry unintended (or calculated) political overtones.

“Brands are tired of walking on eggshells,” said one former creative director.
“But they’re swinging so far in the other direction, they’re now flirting with fascist iconography — even if they don’t realize it.”

Whether this is naive styling or intentional provocation, the result is the same: controversy, virality, and divided headlines — the very fuel modern brands often thrive on.

🧠 Final Thought: Aesthetic Isn’t Always Neutral

The backlash against Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad isn’t just about clothes or even politics — it’s about how visual language carries memory, meaning, and consequence.

To some, it’s just wheat and denim.
To others, it’s a sanitized version of a darker past, repackaged for modern consumption.

Whether you see a fashion faux pas or a warning sign, one thing is clear:
This campaign struck a nerve — and it may have been designed to.

Hỏi ChatGPT